In this weeks blog I will look at the research question that my research group has suggested to put forward as our presentation topic.
The research group that I belong to consists of myself, Kerry Williams, Deborah England, Kristian Leech and Laura Underwood. I have known both Kerry Williams and Laura Underwood as friends since starting my degree at UCLAN, and I have been friends with Deborah England and Kristian Leech since they arrived at UCLAN at the beginning of the second year of study. I am very much looking forward to working with the research team over the coming weeks, as I believe our existing friendships will enable us to engage in in depth and meaningful discussions that may help to inform our success in terms of a good working relationship that promotes advancing critical analysis and debate. I believe that as the group is already familiar with each other this will dispense of the sometimes time consuming task of 'getting to know one another' and understanding the research areas of specific interest to each member in the group. In this respect, already knowing the members on the group has been helpful to me, as I am aware of each members specific research interests.
I am aware that the group as a whole appears to be interested in concepts of gender identity with an emphasis on the construction of heterosexuality as 'normal' and therefore the only 'acceptable' form of sexual identity. This group-wide interest has led us to suggest a research question that is based around on the various representations of heterosexuality in contemporary British magazines. We have proposed that our research topic question for the poster presentation will be based upon the extent that heterosexuality is promoted as the only sexual identity within a carefully selected range of magazines. This research project may serve to support the argument by Batchelor et al that heterosexuality has been constantly promoted in magazines and 'the relentless focus on monogamous heterosexual relationships [appears to be] the goal to which all women should aspire (Batchelor, Kitzinger & Burtney 2004).
Initially we had a little difficulty pinning down a small enough sample of magazines that would cover an acceptable cross-section of magazine readers but eventually as a group we decided that we would analyse the content of Shout, Bizarre, Cosmopolitan and FHM. I believe that the selection of magazines that we have chosen will help us to understand just how evident heterosexual identity is among men's magazines such as FHM, magazines aimed at teenage girls such as Shout, magazines for women such as Cosmopolitan and those magazines aimed at those readers who identify with an 'alternative lifestyle'. I believe the selection of magazines offers a good variety of texts that will enable a substantial cross-sectional content analysis.
I will look towards the theories of Judith Butler and Adrienne Rich in order to facilitate this research project. Alongside the assertion that gender is a performance, Butler is also concerned with the ways that heterosexuality is mediated within the binary of the male-female gender system. According to Butler, heterosexuality is proliferated and situated within the static male-female binary that ultimately creates any sexual identity that is non heterosexual as different and therefore outside of the 'normal' (Butler 1990:24).
In terms of heterosexuality being situated as only 'acceptable' sexual identity, I will consider the work of Adrienne Rich and her assertion that 'compulsory heterosexuality' is an imposed sexual identity. Rich suggests that a countering of women's sexuality has occurred in many ways, and as such, heterosexuality becomes situated as an identity that must be externally enforced, imposed and regulated (Rich 1980:648). In this respect, Rich asserts that heterosexuality is the only viable existence (ibid p.640).
The magazines that the group finally decided to consider (Shout, Bizarre, Cosmopolitan, FHM) were chosen as they appear to appeal to a wide variety of reader demographics and also appear to intersect aspects of class, ethnicity, and economic position. It is not yet clear from the research whether the magazines that we have chosen will give a good representation of different genders and sexualities. My aim is for this research is to answer the following concern, and I assume that through the process of gaining the data in the magazines that we as a research group will have a better understanding of the prevalence of sexual identities within contemporary print media.
The research question that the group is working on may actually produce answers that would fit an initial hypothesis, that heterosexuality is, in overwhelming terms supported and defined as the only acceptable sexual identity within many contemporary magazines in circulation. I suspect that FHM, Cosmopolitan and Shout are all likely to proliferate textual messages of heterosexuality as 'the norm', alongside the use of specific imagery to support the primary position in society that a heterosexual identity dominates. I theorize that the only magazine that may not support the primacy of heterosexuality is Bizarre, as it is the only magazine out of the magazines that we have chosen to analyse that appears to publish texts and images that do not support the dominant heterosexual framework in modern print.
The primary method of social research in respect of this module will be the content analysis approach that will aim to collate data on articles that either appear to support or deny a heterosexual identity as a dominant sexual identity. I believe that most of the data that we will be considering will be qualitative in its nature as it based upon subjective meanings and emotions that are associated with a heterosexual identity.
In terms of ease of use, the ability to explore easily available magazines and their content and style has made the collection of data and imagery relatively easy and simple to undertake. This means that having the data instantly to hand has benefits over other methods of data collection that may be more time consuming , such as looking through large data sets online, or having to visit public libraries to get research information that is suitable to use.
This research project may serve to highlight the influential nature of contemporary magazines and the effects that they have upon the proliferation and dominance of heterosexual themes and images. In relation to women's magazines, Garner et al argue that 'Because of their accessibility, affordability and private and anonymous nature, such magazines are in a strong position to influence the attitudes and behaviours of a significant proportion of women' (Garner, Sterk & Adams 1998). I find this to be a very interesting point, and in relation to magazines aimed at teenage girls, and the effects that the influential nature of such themes could have their readers. Therefore I am eager to explore this assertion in relation to images of heterosexuality that are produced in Shout, a magazine that is aimed at 11 to 14 year old girls.
Throughout all of the magazines and their textual themes, I am interested in examining the ways in which sexuality (and specifically heterosexuality) has become generally more prevalent as an ongoing theme that occurs across all genres of lifestyle magazine (including male, female, teenage girl and alternative lifestyle magazines). Kim and Ward state that 'one only has to glance at the cover of any women’s lifestyle magazine to be aware that articles about sex have become a staple of this genre, with their sexual content increasing in recent decades' (Kim & Ward 2004).
Drawing conclusions, I believe that this research topic offers a very large area of study, with potential for a very rewarding research project that will help myself and the research team to develop critical skills in the collection of data, the analysis of data and the interpretation of results. Ultimately, I believe that this research project will enhance my existing understanding of the ways in which sexuality is defined and supported by the media, and will hopefully increase my understanding of the research process, its limitations and its benefits.



